Mend
Application security platform covering dependency, code and container scanning plus AI security testing.
How the 6.2 was reached
- Quality of output7/10
Rated 4.3/5 on Gartner from 183 reviews; Strong Performer in two Forrester Waves. gartner.com
- Ease of use6/10
Native GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure integration and a free vulnerability search; no setup-time evidence. mend.io
- Pricing value4/10
Published as up to $1000 per dev per year for AppSec; independent users call it relatively expensive. mend.io
- API and integration quality7/10
Docs cover a platform API, integrations and guides for each product area; no API examples seen. docs.mend.io
- Solves the problem it claims to solve7/10
Reachability analysis and AI security coverage confirmed independently; cost concerns noted. appsecsanta.com
6.2/10 is the mean of the 5 criteria that apply. Scored on the five-criteria rubric v1, 29 September 2026. How scoring works
Pricing
- SCA, SAST, containers, DAST
- AI red teaming
- Runtime protection
- Automated dependency updates
Key Features
- SCA, SAST, container scanning and DAST
- Reachability analysis with EPSS and CVSS 4.0 prioritization
- AI red teaming, runtime guardrails and system prompt hardening
- Native GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure integration
- Free open source vulnerability search
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Rated 4.3/5 on Gartner from 183 reviews
- Strong Performer in two Forrester Waves
- Reachability analysis helps rank exploitable risks
- Docs cover a platform API and each product area
Cons
- Independent users call it relatively expensive
- Up to $1000 per dev per year adds up for large teams
- No API examples seen in the docs
- No setup-time evidence
Mend suits security teams that want dependency, code and AI security in one platform and can carry the per-dev cost. Small teams on tight budgets should weigh cheaper scanners.
Try Mend →Added to scored.tools on
Competitors to Mend
Other tools in the automation category worth comparing.