Writing

Meta AI

Meta's free Llama-powered assistant built into WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger, and Ray-Ban smart glasses.

Opens meta.ai in a new tab.

How the 5.8 was reached

  1. Quality of output5/10

    Muse Spark trails GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 on GDPval-AA and scores 42.5 vs 76 on ARC-AGI-2; capable but behind leaders. Source: startuphub.ai

  2. Ease of use7/10

    Free to use with a Meta Account single sign-on across Facebook, Instagram and other Meta apps; no other setup evidence found. Source: meta.ai

  3. Pricing value8/10

    Core assistant is free; Meta One plans run $7.99-$49.99/mo. Free tier throttles under load. Source: comparedge.com

  4. API and integration quality5/10

    A TypeScript SDK and webhook guides exist, but only from third-party sources; no official docs page was found. Source: datastudios.org

  5. Solves the problem it claims to solve4/10

    No stated claim; Trustpilot reviews report poor support and responses deleted after 'Thinking.'. Source: ca.trustpilot.com

5.8/10 is the average of the five criterion scores above. The evidence comes from 5 different sources.Scores come from public evidence (the tool's own pages and documentation, and independent reviews); we do not test every tool hands-on. Scored 29 September 2026, on version 1 of our five-criteria scoring method.

Pricing

Free
$0/mo
  • Unlimited chat with Llama 4
  • Image generation
  • Voice mode
  • Native in WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger
  • Ray-Ban Meta glasses integration
  • Web app at meta.ai
Llama API
Pay per token
  • Llama 4 Maverick and Scout via API
  • Llama Guard safety models
  • Self-host the open-weight models for free
  • Fine-tuning support

For the full list of what each plan includes, and current prices, see comparedge.com.

Key Features

  • Llama 4 Maverick (flagship) and Llama 4 Scout (long context)
  • Open-weight models (free to self-host)
  • Native in WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger, Facebook
  • Image generation with Imagine
  • Voice mode with celebrity voice options
  • Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses integration
  • Real-time translation
  • 10M+ token context window on Llama 4 Scout

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Genuinely free with no usage caps for consumer chat
  • Open-weight models you can self-host or fine-tune
  • Native in apps billions of people already use daily
  • Llama 4 Scout's 10M token context is the largest of any model

Cons

  • Lacks dedicated power-user product (no $20 tier with stronger model)
  • Web UI at meta.ai is bare-bones compared to ChatGPT or Claude
  • Reasoning quality trails GPT-5 and Claude on hard tasks
  • No native code-execution / browser-use / agent features
Verdict

Meta AI suits casual users who want a free assistant tied to their Meta account. Its Muse Spark model trails GPT and Claude rivals on benchmarks, the free tier throttles under load, and reviewers report weak support.

Added to scored.tools on

For the Meta AI team: put this score on your website

Meta AI on scored.tools: 5.8/10

A small image (a badge) that shows this score and links back to this page. Free for any tool, at any score. It always shows the current score, so it changes when the score does. Copy this code into your website where you want the badge:

<a href="https://scored.tools/tools/meta-ai/"><img src="https://scored.tools/badge/meta-ai.svg" alt="Meta AI on scored.tools: 5.8/10" width="160" height="40"></a>

Do you work for Meta AI? Claim this page: prove you work there, then confirm the facts, correct a mistake or add a short reply. It is free and never changes the score.

Meta AI Comparisons

Head-to-head comparisons featuring Meta AI.

Competitors to Meta AI

Other tools in the Writing category worth comparing.

More Articles Featuring Meta AI

Scored this week

One email a week: new reviews, score changes and one pick. You confirm by email, and unsubscribe in one click.