Pigment
Business planning platform for budgeting, forecasting and scenario work, with AI agents and an MCP server.
How the 5.2 was reached
- Quality of output6/10
Ranked #1 for agentic AI in EPM by Dresner Advisory Services, but that is a single ranking source. pigment.com
- Ease of use5/10
14-day free trial and live demo, but reviewers cite complexity and a steep learning curve. pigment.com
- Pricing value3/10
Entry level about $30K-50K a year, mid-market $200K-400K, with no free self-serve tier; a 14-day trial is offered. cfoshortlist.com
- API and integration quality5/10
MCP server connects planning data to Claude and an integrations page exists; no public API docs were found. pigment.com
- Solves the problem it claims to solve7/10
4.6/5 on G2 from 114 reviews and a Gartner Visionary recognition; smaller organisations find it complex. g2.com
5.2/10 is the mean of the 5 criteria that apply. Scored on the five-criteria rubric v1, 29 September 2026. How scoring works
Pricing
- Live demo available
- Third-party estimates: about $30K-50K a year entry, $200K-400K mid-market
Key Features
- Budget planning, P&L and forecasting
- Revenue, sales operations and demand planning
- ESG reporting
- MCP server connecting planning data to Claude
- Ranked #1 for agentic AI in EPM by Dresner Advisory Services
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Wide planning coverage across finance and operations
- 4.6/5 on G2 from 114 reviews
- Gartner Visionary recognition
- 14-day trial and live demo
Cons
- Entry cost estimated at $30K-50K a year with no self-serve tier
- Reviewers cite complexity and a steep learning curve
- No public API docs found
- Smaller organisations find it heavy
Pigment suits mid-size and large finance teams that can fund a planning platform and its setup. Small businesses should look at simpler tools. The rating is modest mainly because of price and complexity.
Try Pigment →Added to scored.tools on