Otter.ai
AI meeting agent that transcribes conversations, extracts action items, and syncs notes to your CRM.
How the 6.8 was reached
- Quality of output6/10
Independent tests show 92-95% accuracy on clear audio, dropping to 70-75% with cross-talk; weak speaker identification. lindy.ai
- Ease of use9/10
Free start with no card, desktop app for Mac and Windows, and bot-free recording. otter.ai
- Pricing value7/10
Free plan with 300 monthly minutes; Business $19/user/month with unlimited meetings; in line with the category. otter.ai
- API and integration quality7/10
Integrations with Zoom, Teams, Meet, Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier and Jira, plus an MCP server; no public API is documented. otter.ai
- Solves the problem it claims to solve5/10
Transcribes and summarises, but independent reviews report unreliable speakers, limited automation and privacy problems including a federal lawsuit. lindy.ai
6.8/10 is the mean of the 5 criteria that apply. Scored on the five-criteria rubric v1, 29 September 2026. How scoring works
Pricing
- 300 monthly transcription minutes
- 30-min limit per conversation
- Imports up to 3 audio/video files
- Basic summaries
- 1,200 monthly transcription minutes
- 90-min limit per conversation
- Unlimited audio/video imports
- Advanced search
- 6,000 monthly transcription minutes
- 4-hour limit per conversation
- Team collaboration features
- CRM integrations
- Admin console
- Unlimited minutes
- SSO and advanced security
- Custom retention policies
- Dedicated support
Key Features
- Real-time meeting transcription with speaker identification
- Automated summaries and action item extraction
- CRM sync for Salesforce and HubSpot
- SDR and recruiting agent modes for sales and HR workflows
- Searchable meeting archive across the whole team
- Chrome extension for Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Speaker diarization is reliable for clean audio
- Real-time transcript visible during the meeting, not just after
- Deep Zoom and Google Meet integrations work without manual recording steps
- Free tier is genuinely usable for individuals with modest meeting loads
Cons
- Transcription accuracy drops sharply with heavy accents or overlapping speakers
- Minute caps on lower tiers run out fast for high-volume teams
- AI-generated action items miss context and often need manual cleanup
- Mobile app lacks the full feature set of the desktop experience
Otter.ai is a dependable first choice for meeting transcription — the real-time display and CRM sync make it practical for sales and recruiting teams, not just individual note-takers. Accuracy is good on clear audio but struggles with crosstalk, and the minute limits push most teams onto paid plans quickly. Worth trialing before committing; Fireflies and Descript cover similar ground with different trade-offs on price and editing depth.
Try Otter.ai →Added to scored.tools on
Competitors to Otter.ai
Other tools in the productivity category worth comparing.
Descript
6.6/10Edit video and audio like a text document — transcribe, cut, overdub, and publish in one AI-powered tool.
Loom
6.8/10Easy screen recording and video messaging for teams and collaboration
Riverside.fm
6.8/10AI-powered platform for recording, editing, and repurposing studio-quality podcasts and videos.
Deepgram
7.4/10Unified Speech-to-Text, Text-to-Speech, and Voice Agent APIs built for enterprise scale and real-time accuracy.